External affairs minister S Jaishankar on Friday said that the root of the ongoing issue of Sri Lanka arresting Indian fishermen lies in a controversial agreement made during the Emergency era, under which India gave up certain fishing rights.
Speaking at an event organised by the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) to mark the 50th anniversary of Emergency, Jaishankar said such a deal would not have gone through if Parliament had been functioning properly at the time.
“We hear about our fishermen arrested by Sri Lanka. The reason is that an agreement was entered into during Emergency under which the rights of the fishermen for fishing in some sea waters of Sri Lanka was abandoned,” Jaishankar said.
The 1974 maritime agreement, signed under then the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, ceded the uninhabited Katchatheevu island to Sri Lanka. A follow-up agreement in 1976 barred Indian and Sri Lankan fishermen from entering each other’s exclusive economic zones—restrictions that continue to affect fishing communities in Tamil Nadu.
“The consequences of this decision are still visible in Tamil Nadu,” the EAM noted.
Criticising the Congress for bypassing democratic processes during the Emergency, Jaishankar said, “Had a genuine Parliament functioned at the time, there would have been a debate and this decision would not be accepted.”
He said many major decisions were taken without public or parliamentary scrutiny during that 21-month period, which began on June 25, 1975.
Reflecting on the time, Jaishankar recalled police raids in Jawaharlal Nehru University hostels and shared how his family had links with anti-Emergency leaders such as George Fernandes. “I heard from my seniors in the foreign service how difficult it was to defend India after the murder of the Constitution and democracy by the imposition of Emergency,” he said.
In a pointed attack on the Congress leadership, Jaishankar said that an Emergency situation arises when the ‘family’ is kept ahead of the country.
“Some people keep the copy of Constitution in their pockets but have other intentions in their hearts,” PTI cited the external minister.
Without naming Rahul Gandhi directly, he questioned the party's refusal to apologise for the Emergency, saying it was not just a political mistake but an assault on the people’s way of life.
The younger generation must learn how the Congress strangled the Constitution out of greed for power, he said, referring to the mock parliament conducted by the BJYM. He further added that empowering citizens is the key to preventing any similar situation in future.
He also took a swipe at the opposition’s repeated claims of an “undeclared Emergency” under the current government. “I want to clarify that this is not the time of an Emergency nor will there be one in the future. That is why we are all present here at this mock parliament today,” he said.
During the Emergency, Jaishankar pointed out, five Constitutional amendments and 48 Ordinances were passed, one of which prevented Emergency provisions from being challenged in any court.
Calling India’s peaceful resistance during that time proof that “democracy is in our DNA,” he said the public's rejection of Emergency through the ballot box eventually led to fresh elections and the restoration of democratic rule.
He also touched on moments of unity, saying Operation Sindoor, where even opposition leaders joined efforts to bolster India’s global position, reflected “deep national pride” and stood as an antidote to the authoritarianism of the Emergency.
"The events of 50 years ago should not just be viewed as history — they still live on in the minds of many. Therefore, we must remain cautious of those who still have no regret about the Emergency," he said.
Speaking at an event organised by the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) to mark the 50th anniversary of Emergency, Jaishankar said such a deal would not have gone through if Parliament had been functioning properly at the time.
“We hear about our fishermen arrested by Sri Lanka. The reason is that an agreement was entered into during Emergency under which the rights of the fishermen for fishing in some sea waters of Sri Lanka was abandoned,” Jaishankar said.
The 1974 maritime agreement, signed under then the Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government, ceded the uninhabited Katchatheevu island to Sri Lanka. A follow-up agreement in 1976 barred Indian and Sri Lankan fishermen from entering each other’s exclusive economic zones—restrictions that continue to affect fishing communities in Tamil Nadu.
“The consequences of this decision are still visible in Tamil Nadu,” the EAM noted.
Criticising the Congress for bypassing democratic processes during the Emergency, Jaishankar said, “Had a genuine Parliament functioned at the time, there would have been a debate and this decision would not be accepted.”
He said many major decisions were taken without public or parliamentary scrutiny during that 21-month period, which began on June 25, 1975.
Reflecting on the time, Jaishankar recalled police raids in Jawaharlal Nehru University hostels and shared how his family had links with anti-Emergency leaders such as George Fernandes. “I heard from my seniors in the foreign service how difficult it was to defend India after the murder of the Constitution and democracy by the imposition of Emergency,” he said.
In a pointed attack on the Congress leadership, Jaishankar said that an Emergency situation arises when the ‘family’ is kept ahead of the country.
“Some people keep the copy of Constitution in their pockets but have other intentions in their hearts,” PTI cited the external minister.
Without naming Rahul Gandhi directly, he questioned the party's refusal to apologise for the Emergency, saying it was not just a political mistake but an assault on the people’s way of life.
The younger generation must learn how the Congress strangled the Constitution out of greed for power, he said, referring to the mock parliament conducted by the BJYM. He further added that empowering citizens is the key to preventing any similar situation in future.
He also took a swipe at the opposition’s repeated claims of an “undeclared Emergency” under the current government. “I want to clarify that this is not the time of an Emergency nor will there be one in the future. That is why we are all present here at this mock parliament today,” he said.
During the Emergency, Jaishankar pointed out, five Constitutional amendments and 48 Ordinances were passed, one of which prevented Emergency provisions from being challenged in any court.
Calling India’s peaceful resistance during that time proof that “democracy is in our DNA,” he said the public's rejection of Emergency through the ballot box eventually led to fresh elections and the restoration of democratic rule.
He also touched on moments of unity, saying Operation Sindoor, where even opposition leaders joined efforts to bolster India’s global position, reflected “deep national pride” and stood as an antidote to the authoritarianism of the Emergency.
"The events of 50 years ago should not just be viewed as history — they still live on in the minds of many. Therefore, we must remain cautious of those who still have no regret about the Emergency," he said.
You may also like
New type of number plates in offing for hydrogen vehicles
Those who move in luxury cars won't get benefits of loan waiver: Maha minister
Mechanic crushed by falling car as he prayed on break at garage
Liverpool chief admits Trent Alexander-Arnold disappointment and details parting message
Keir Starmer warned of 'two tier' benefit system as he says U-turn 'strikes right balance'
