During his campaign, Donald Trump has made several high-profile promises, some of which have sparked debate over their feasibility and potential impact. Many of Trump’s campaign promises involve significant legal , legislative, and logistical obstacles, meaning that even with substantial executive power, achieving these objectives would require cooperation from Congress, states, and possibly even constitutional amendments.
The feasibility of these proposals largely hinges on navigating political opposition, potential legal battles, and the practical realities of implementation, making some of these promises more symbolic than achievable. Here’s a rundown of some of the bold promises he’s made on the trail, alongside an analysis of their practicality:
1. Massive Federal Layoffs and Rehiring of "Loyalists"
Promise: Trump has pledged to overhaul the federal bureaucracy, replacing thousands of federal workers with those he considers "loyalists."
Feasibility: Although a president can influence federal hiring and policies, sweeping federal layoffs face strong resistance due to existing civil service protections, union agreements, and procedural hurdles. Such moves would likely face significant legal challenges from federal employee unions and watchdog groups questioning the legality of mass firings based on political affiliation.
2. Nationwide Tariffs on All Imports
Promise: Trump has proposed a 10% tariff on all imports to boost domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign goods.
Feasibility: Imposing such a broad tariff would require congressional support, which is far from guaranteed. Economists warn that a blanket tariff could raise costs for American consumers, strain trade relations, and potentially prompt retaliatory tariffs. Higher import costs could impact inflation, a point that might attract criticism from economic policymakers.
3. Largest Deportation Operation in U.S. History
Promise: Trump has vowed to launch the most extensive deportation effort ever, targeting millions of undocumented immigrants.
Feasibility: While the federal government has the authority to enforce immigration laws, scaling up to this level would require massive resources, funding, and cooperation from local law enforcement. Such an operation would likely face legal pushback and public resistance, particularly in sanctuary cities. The logistical complexity and potential societal disruption make this a challenging promise to fulfil.
4. Building a "Freedom Cities" Initiative
Promise: Trump has proposed constructing "freedom cities" on federal land to address housing shortages and encourage innovation.
Feasibility: Creating new cities would be a monumental task involving land use policy, infrastructure development, environmental reviews, and state cooperation. While it’s possible for the federal government to support housing initiatives, building entirely new cities from scratch would require substantial funding, legislative approval, and time—likely extending beyond a single presidential term.
5. Implementing the Death Penalty for Drug Dealers
Promise: Trump has expressed support for imposing the death penalty on drug dealers to deter drug-related crimes.
Feasibility: Implementing this would be a significant legal and constitutional hurdle, as it would require changes to federal law and might face challenges regarding Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment. Applying the death penalty broadly would likely encounter strong judicial opposition.
6. Withdrawing from NATO and Other International Alliances
Promise: Trump has suggested reconsidering US involvement in NATO and scaling back certain international commitments.
Feasibility: While a president can influence foreign policy, withdrawing from NATO would face resistance from Congress and military leaders, as it is a treaty-bound alliance integral to US defence strategy. Exiting NATO would likely be unpopular with allies and could be seen as a threat to US influence on the global stage.
7. Establishing Strict Term Limits for Congress
Promise: Trump has proposed imposing term limits for members of Congress.
Feasibility: Changing term limits would require a constitutional amendment, as term limits are not currently part of US law for federal offices. This amendment would need a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, as well as ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures—a high bar that makes this unlikely to be achieved swiftly, if at all.
8. Nationalising Industries in Strategic Sectors
Promise: Trump has hinted at increasing US control over industries deemed strategic, such as energy.
Feasibility: Nationalising industries is rare in the US and would meet strong legal, economic, and political opposition. It would require new legislation, significant federal resources, and could clash with private sector interests, raising questions of economic efficiency and constitutional authority.
9. Reviving the Border Wall with More Robust Additions
Promise: Trump has pledged to restart and expand the border wall construction with added technological enhancements.
Feasibility: While Trump may have executive power to direct border security funds, constructing a larger, more advanced wall would require sustained funding from Congress. Legal disputes over land rights and environmental concerns would also challenge rapid expansion efforts.
10. Launching an “American Energy” Initiative
Promise: Trump has promised to restore and prioritise energy independence by maximising US energy production, especially fossil fuels.
Feasibility: Increasing fossil fuel production could be pursued through executive orders and regulatory changes, but would face resistance from environmental advocates and potential legal constraints. Shifts to renewable energy and global environmental commitments add further complexity, limiting the extent to which fossil fuels can be prioritised without political and environmental repercussions.
11. Ending the Russia-Ukraine War in 24 Hours
Promise: Trump has frequently claimed he could end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within 24 hours by negotiating directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Feasibility: While a US president has significant diplomatic influence, resolving such a complex conflict in 24 hours is highly improbable. The war involves deep-rooted geopolitical issues, territorial disputes, and significant military and economic stakes for both countries and their allies.
The feasibility of these proposals largely hinges on navigating political opposition, potential legal battles, and the practical realities of implementation, making some of these promises more symbolic than achievable. Here’s a rundown of some of the bold promises he’s made on the trail, alongside an analysis of their practicality:
1. Massive Federal Layoffs and Rehiring of "Loyalists"
Promise: Trump has pledged to overhaul the federal bureaucracy, replacing thousands of federal workers with those he considers "loyalists."
Feasibility: Although a president can influence federal hiring and policies, sweeping federal layoffs face strong resistance due to existing civil service protections, union agreements, and procedural hurdles. Such moves would likely face significant legal challenges from federal employee unions and watchdog groups questioning the legality of mass firings based on political affiliation.
2. Nationwide Tariffs on All Imports
Promise: Trump has proposed a 10% tariff on all imports to boost domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign goods.
Feasibility: Imposing such a broad tariff would require congressional support, which is far from guaranteed. Economists warn that a blanket tariff could raise costs for American consumers, strain trade relations, and potentially prompt retaliatory tariffs. Higher import costs could impact inflation, a point that might attract criticism from economic policymakers.
3. Largest Deportation Operation in U.S. History
Promise: Trump has vowed to launch the most extensive deportation effort ever, targeting millions of undocumented immigrants.
Feasibility: While the federal government has the authority to enforce immigration laws, scaling up to this level would require massive resources, funding, and cooperation from local law enforcement. Such an operation would likely face legal pushback and public resistance, particularly in sanctuary cities. The logistical complexity and potential societal disruption make this a challenging promise to fulfil.
4. Building a "Freedom Cities" Initiative
Promise: Trump has proposed constructing "freedom cities" on federal land to address housing shortages and encourage innovation.
Feasibility: Creating new cities would be a monumental task involving land use policy, infrastructure development, environmental reviews, and state cooperation. While it’s possible for the federal government to support housing initiatives, building entirely new cities from scratch would require substantial funding, legislative approval, and time—likely extending beyond a single presidential term.
5. Implementing the Death Penalty for Drug Dealers
Promise: Trump has expressed support for imposing the death penalty on drug dealers to deter drug-related crimes.
Feasibility: Implementing this would be a significant legal and constitutional hurdle, as it would require changes to federal law and might face challenges regarding Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment. Applying the death penalty broadly would likely encounter strong judicial opposition.
6. Withdrawing from NATO and Other International Alliances
Promise: Trump has suggested reconsidering US involvement in NATO and scaling back certain international commitments.
Feasibility: While a president can influence foreign policy, withdrawing from NATO would face resistance from Congress and military leaders, as it is a treaty-bound alliance integral to US defence strategy. Exiting NATO would likely be unpopular with allies and could be seen as a threat to US influence on the global stage.
7. Establishing Strict Term Limits for Congress
Promise: Trump has proposed imposing term limits for members of Congress.
Feasibility: Changing term limits would require a constitutional amendment, as term limits are not currently part of US law for federal offices. This amendment would need a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, as well as ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures—a high bar that makes this unlikely to be achieved swiftly, if at all.
8. Nationalising Industries in Strategic Sectors
Promise: Trump has hinted at increasing US control over industries deemed strategic, such as energy.
Feasibility: Nationalising industries is rare in the US and would meet strong legal, economic, and political opposition. It would require new legislation, significant federal resources, and could clash with private sector interests, raising questions of economic efficiency and constitutional authority.
9. Reviving the Border Wall with More Robust Additions
Promise: Trump has pledged to restart and expand the border wall construction with added technological enhancements.
Feasibility: While Trump may have executive power to direct border security funds, constructing a larger, more advanced wall would require sustained funding from Congress. Legal disputes over land rights and environmental concerns would also challenge rapid expansion efforts.
10. Launching an “American Energy” Initiative
Promise: Trump has promised to restore and prioritise energy independence by maximising US energy production, especially fossil fuels.
Feasibility: Increasing fossil fuel production could be pursued through executive orders and regulatory changes, but would face resistance from environmental advocates and potential legal constraints. Shifts to renewable energy and global environmental commitments add further complexity, limiting the extent to which fossil fuels can be prioritised without political and environmental repercussions.
11. Ending the Russia-Ukraine War in 24 Hours
Promise: Trump has frequently claimed he could end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within 24 hours by negotiating directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Feasibility: While a US president has significant diplomatic influence, resolving such a complex conflict in 24 hours is highly improbable. The war involves deep-rooted geopolitical issues, territorial disputes, and significant military and economic stakes for both countries and their allies.
You may also like
11 things Trump has promised to do as soon as he becomes President
Ruben Amorim sends reality check to Man Utd fans after humiliating Man City
Rachel Reeves has broken a manifesto pledge - Kemi Badenoch must hold her to account
Chhath Puja: Which states have declared holidays
Ryanair charges woman 'ridiculous' bag fee as one wheel poked out of size checker
